<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Whole Foods Boycott and other things, food related&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mama-is.com/the-whole-foods-boycott-and-other-things-food-related/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mama-is.com/the-whole-foods-boycott-and-other-things-food-related/</link>
	<description>old comic archives...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mama-is.com/the-whole-foods-boycott-and-other-things-food-related/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mama-is.com/?p=743#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>Hi Lori,
For me, I was shocked to find out about the CEO&#039;s beliefs (but perhaps more shocked by his publishing them in the newspaper, as if the &#039;loyal&#039; customers, a great many of whom would disagree, didn&#039;t matter.) But I was more shocked to hear that he&#039;s anti-union. My family is a union family and proudly so. But I misspoke in my post, I&#039;m not technically joining the boycott, a boycott is effective as a temporary withdrawal of money, to prove a point. Not as an endless removal of cash forever. I don&#039;t shop at Whole Foods very often anyways, I have one (a brand new flagship store, gorgeous!) within 2 miles of my house (as the crow flies, though I would have to drive to get there) But I frankly can&#039;t afford to shop there. I go if I need a remedy of some kind, and can only buy a few things there, ever. 

Whether I join or not is probably immaterial to the CEO (I do find it interesting, that as corporations have gained &#039;personhood&#039; and constitutional rights to free speech and other guaranteed provisions, that we allow that there isn&#039;t any one person who is responsible for the corporation. Is there no one that speaks for them, or acts for them in their name?The CEO is just an &#039;employee&#039;, the shareholders are just one of many, who is actually responsible for the actions of the corporation? If no one is responsible then why do they have the &#039;rights&#039;? I&#039;m not asking anyone, I&#039;m just asking ;o) 

But, this knowledge will guide my personal shopping choices. But really, there aren&#039;t many choices are there? (Okay, that one I&#039;m asking)

xox,
Heather

ps. I had hoped that the nuances of my thinking on this subject would come through, but I&#039;m altering the original post a bit to reflect my real thoughts on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lori,<br />
For me, I was shocked to find out about the CEO&#8217;s beliefs (but perhaps more shocked by his publishing them in the newspaper, as if the &#8216;loyal&#8217; customers, a great many of whom would disagree, didn&#8217;t matter.) But I was more shocked to hear that he&#8217;s anti-union. My family is a union family and proudly so. But I misspoke in my post, I&#8217;m not technically joining the boycott, a boycott is effective as a temporary withdrawal of money, to prove a point. Not as an endless removal of cash forever. I don&#8217;t shop at Whole Foods very often anyways, I have one (a brand new flagship store, gorgeous!) within 2 miles of my house (as the crow flies, though I would have to drive to get there) But I frankly can&#8217;t afford to shop there. I go if I need a remedy of some kind, and can only buy a few things there, ever. </p>
<p>Whether I join or not is probably immaterial to the CEO (I do find it interesting, that as corporations have gained &#8216;personhood&#8217; and constitutional rights to free speech and other guaranteed provisions, that we allow that there isn&#8217;t any one person who is responsible for the corporation. Is there no one that speaks for them, or acts for them in their name?The CEO is just an &#8216;employee&#8217;, the shareholders are just one of many, who is actually responsible for the actions of the corporation? If no one is responsible then why do they have the &#8216;rights&#8217;? I&#8217;m not asking anyone, I&#8217;m just asking ;o) </p>
<p>But, this knowledge will guide my personal shopping choices. But really, there aren&#8217;t many choices are there? (Okay, that one I&#8217;m asking)</p>
<p>xox,<br />
Heather</p>
<p>ps. I had hoped that the nuances of my thinking on this subject would come through, but I&#8217;m altering the original post a bit to reflect my real thoughts on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

